Development of health density indicators in South Africa using GIS
OUTPUT TYPE: Conference or seminar papers
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2012
TITLE AUTHOR(S): T.Mokhele, G.Weir-Smith, D.Labadarios
KEYWORDS: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS), PUBLIC HEALTH
Intranet: HSRC Library: shelf number 7455
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/3226
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3226
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2012
TITLE AUTHOR(S): T.Mokhele, G.Weir-Smith, D.Labadarios
KEYWORDS: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS), PUBLIC HEALTH
Intranet: HSRC Library: shelf number 7455
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/3226
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3226
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
The scope and emphasis of a public health program are necessarily influenced by the changing characteristics of the population it serves. In South Africa, population growth between 2004 and 2009 has outstripped the availability of health facilities. GIS provides ideal platforms for decision makers to easily visualize problems in relation to existing health services as well as distribution of health facilities and their surrounding populations. Therefore this research was aimed at developing health density indicators in South Africa at a sub-provincial level using GIS in order for decision makers to target appropriate populations and areas for intervention. This research used the existing (5043) public health facilities data (2010) together with some additional data from the Department of Health and Stats SA Community Survey 2007 population estimates at municipality level to develop two health facilities density indicators. The first indicator, health facilities per population, was calculated by dividing the number of health facilities by the total population (per 10 000) at a municipal level. The second indicator was calculated by dividing the number of health facilities by square kilometre. Findings showed that most municipalities that had a low coverage in terms of the number of health facilities per 10000 population are located in the eastern part of the country as well as in urban areas even though there are more health facilities in these urban areas as the total population is also much higher due to migration. Therefore, the combination of the two indicators is of high importance in final decision making in prioritizing areas for health care interventions for large municipalities characterized with low populations.-
Related Research Outputs:
- A history of public health in South Africa
- The spatial behaviour of criminal substance users (transparencies)
- Behind the mask: getting to grips with crime and violence in South Africa
- Crime, violence and public health
- Geo-demographics, LSM's and modelling
- African renaissance: towards the development of a spatial information system for socio-economic development in Africa
- GIS as a tool to define, understand and add value to your market
- Between poverty and prosperity: the new development: agenda for Africa
- The application of GIS and web mapping in injury surveillance
- Services & infrastructure
- GIS, health and NEPAD: the role of spatial information in meeting a key social priority
- A framework for analysing poverty and inequality in GIS
- HIV risk exposure among young children: a study of 2-9 year olds served by public health facilities in the Free State, South Africa
- Public health and the quality of drinking water in rural communities in South Africa: issues arising from the cholera epidemic 2000/01
- An overview of the usage and content of socio-economic, geographic and demographic information on Thohoyandou-Malamulele
- Appendix B: GIS as a tool in migration research
- Substance abuse and HIV risk behaviours in community health centres in Cape Town
- Performative queer identities: masculinities and public bathroom usage
- Catalogue of fundamental geo-spatial datasets for Africa: project report
- Stewardship: protecting the public's health