Presentation and interpretation of food intake data: factors affecting comparability across studies
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2013
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Faber, F.A.M.Wenhold, U.E.MacIntyre, E.Wentzel-Viljoen, N.P.Steyn, W.H.Oldewage-Theron
KEYWORDS: DIETARY HABITS, FOOD AND BEVERAGE SECTOR, FOOD AND NUTRITION, WEIGHT MANAGEMENT
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 7892
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/2818
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/2818
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Non-uniform, unclear, or incomplete presentation of food intake data limits interpretation, usefulness, and comparisons across studies. In this contribution, we discuss factors affecting uniform reporting of food intake across studies. The amount of food eaten can be reported as mean portion size, number of servings or total amount of food consumed per day; the absolute intake value for the specific study depends on the denominator used because food intake data can be presented as per capita intake or for consumers only. To identify the foods mostly consumed, foods are reported and ranked according to total number of times consumed, number of consumers, total intake, or nutrient contribution by individual foods or food groups. Presentation of food intake data primarily depends on a study's aim; reported data thus often are not comparable across studies. Food intake data further depend on the dietary assessment methodology used and foods in the database consulted; and are influenced by the inherent limitations of all dietary assessments. Intake data can be presented as either single foods or as clearly defined food groups. Mixed dishes, reported as such or in terms of ingredients and items added during food preparation remain challenging. Comparable presentation of food consumption data is not always possible; presenting sufficient information will assist valid interpretation and optimal use of the presented data. A checklist was developed to strengthen the reporting of food intake data in science communication.-
Related Research Outputs:
- How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
- What's in the lunchbox?: dietary behaviour of learners from disadvantaged schools in the Western Cape, South Africa
- Who is the nutrition workforce in the Western Cape?
- Urbanisation and the nutrition transition: a comparison of diet and weight status of South African and Kenyan women
- The nutrition transition and adequacy of the diet of pregnant women in Kenya
- Stunting, overweight and obesity in the very young: two sides of the coin
- You are what you eat and you eat what you can afford
- Prevalence of overweight/obesity and central obesity and its associated factors among a sample of university students in India
- Assessing nutritional status
- Underestimation of weight and its associated factors in overweight and obese university students from 21 low, middle and emerging economy countries
- Dietary behaviour among male out-patients in Thailand
- Dietary consumption and happiness and depression among university students: a cross-national survey
- Health-enhancing physical activity among university students in nine ASEAN countries
- A focus on four popular "functional foods" as part of a strategy to combat metabolic disease through the increased consumption of fruits and vegetables
- A review of dietary surveys in the adult South African population from 2000-2015
- Editorial: does dietary knowledge influence the eating behaviour of adolescents?
- Dietary, social, and environmental determinants of obesity in Kenyan women
- The cost of a healthy diet: a South African perspective
- Prevalence of obesity and associated factors in South Africans 50 years and older
- Street foods and fast foods: how much do South Africans of different ethnic groups consume?