Myths, misconceptions, othering and stigmatizing responses to Covid-19 in South Africa: a rapid qualitative assessment
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2020
TITLE AUTHOR(S): T.Schmidt, A.Cloete, A.Davids, L.Makola, N.Zondi, M.Jantjies
KEYWORDS: COVID-19, GAUTENG PROVINCE, KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE, PUBLIC OPINION, WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE
DEPARTMENT: Public Health, Societies and Belonging (HSC)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11686
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/15661
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/15661
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new strain of virus in the Coronavirus family that has not been previously identified. Since SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus, everyone is at risk of catching the Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). No one has immunity to the virus. Despite this, misconceptions about specific groups of people who are immune to Covid-19 emerged with the onset of the pandemic. This paper explores South African communities' misconceptions about who is most vulnerable to Covid-19. A rapid qualitative assessment was conducted remotely in Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape provinces of South Africa. Recruitment of study participants took place through established relationships with civil society organizations and contacts made by researchers. In total, 60 key informant interviews and one focus group discussion was conducted. Atlas.ti.8 Windows was used to facilitate qualitative data analysis. The qualitative data was coded, and thematic analysis used to identify themes. The results show a high level of awareness and knowledge of the transmission and prevention of SARS-CoV-2. Qualitative data revealed that there is awareness of elderly people and those with immunocompromised conditions being more vulnerable to catching Covid-19. However, misconceptions of being protected against the virus or having low or no risk were also evident in the data. We found that false information circulated on social media not only instigated confusion, fear and panic, but also contributed to the construction of misconceptions, othering and stigmatizing responses to Covid-19. The study findings bring attention to the importance of developing communication materials adapted to specific communities to help reduce misconceptions, othering and stigmatization around Covid-19.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Audit of pension pay points in South Africa
- Baseline assessment: European Union partnerships for the delivery of primary health care programme in South Africa
- Public participation in decision-making in the Gauteng provincial legislature
- Trends and policy challenges in the rural economy: four provincial case studies
- Clients' perceptions of the service offered by a public mental health clinic in the Western Cape
- Reviewing the role of the provincial and district offices in the implementation of assessment policies in the Gauteng and Western Cape provinces
- Enhancing teaching and learning in schools through assessment: challenges and possibilities (The 3Rs project)
- Reviewing the role of the provincial and district offices in the implementation of assessment policies in the Gauteng and Western Cape provinces
- HIV epidemic in South Africa: a comparison of HIV epidemic patterns of two extreme provinces in South Africa
- Using sport as an intervention for substance abuse reduction among adolescents and young adults in three selected communities in South Africa: an exploratory study
- Public must develop safe death rites
- Media sensation in a time of heightened anxiety: analysing reports in three Western Cape newspapers
- A qualitative analysis of comments received from the general public in response to gazetted amendments to the Disaster Management Act Regulations: Alert Level 3 (Gazette 43521 of 12 July 2020)
- 'Dark cloud with a silver lining'?: the prospect of a rise in material values or a post-material turn in post-pandemic South Africa
- COVID-19 and human rights limitations: taking public opinion into account
- Factors associated with self-efficacy in preventing COVID-19 infection in April 2020, KwaZulu-Natal
- Preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine and lockdown in South Africa: results from a rapid online survey
- Developing a vulnerability score for COVID-19 transmission in KwaZulu-Natal
- The coherence of food and agricultural policies with NCD prevention in South Africa: the case of fruit and vegetable policies study: knowledge and attitudes towards fruit and vegetable consumption among communities in Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga
- Coherence of food and agricultural policies with NCD prevention in South Africa: the case of fruit and vegetable policies study: methodology & fieldwork report