Deconstructing the paradoxes of South Africa's emerging discourse and framework on ICTs and internet governance
SOURCE: Internet governance in the global south: theory, history, and contemporary debates
OUTPUT TYPE: Chapter in Monograph
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2018
TITLE AUTHOR(S): C.Darch, R.Adams, Y.Ke
SOURCE EDITOR(S): D.Opperman
KEYWORDS: GOVERNANCE, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, INTERNET
DEPARTMENT: Impact Centre (IC), Impact Centre (PRESS), Impact Centre (CC)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10711
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/13473
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/13473
OUTPUT TYPE: Chapter in Monograph
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2018
TITLE AUTHOR(S): C.Darch, R.Adams, Y.Ke
SOURCE EDITOR(S): D.Opperman
KEYWORDS: GOVERNANCE, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, INTERNET
DEPARTMENT: Impact Centre (IC), Impact Centre (PRESS), Impact Centre (CC)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10711
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/13473
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/13473
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This chapter examines the development of the White Paper, setting this within a historical framework of ICT policies in South Africa, before critiquing the new policy positions against recent developments within the ICT sector in the country. Critically, we argue that there are a number of paradoxes at play within South Africa's rhetoric on Internet governance - as captured in the White Paper. Indeed, we note that while the White Paper discusses the Internet as a basic right, the country has spoken about the limitations of online rights at international fora. Moreover, we identify that the South African state is re-performing the very critiques it levels against the global system of Internet governance in the White Paper within its own borders. So, while South Africa criticises the lack of state influence - or multilateralism - and the lack of transparency within global Internet governance, it has subsequently failed to promote participation and transparency within its own policy-making processes. The last section of this chapter examines two recent developments - the blocking of cell phone signal during a presidential Parliamentary address in 2015 and the draft Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity bill - against the notion of the 'Open Internet' promoted as a 'core philosophy' of the White Paper. From these developments, what can be discerned is a State which in fact sees control of social media and other channels of communication as fundamental to political stability.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Internet applications in the political sphere: perceptions and views of political institutions in South Africa
- Teledemocracy in South Africa
- Internet applications in the political sphere: perceptions and views of political institutions in South Africa
- Globalisation, regional integration, governance, and household viability envisaging a research, policy and advocacy agenda: roundtable report
- Swaziland: a governance study
- Review of schedules 4 & 5 of the constitution, Volume 2, 29 March
- Information and communications technologies
- Connecting to global markets in the internet age: the case of South African wooden furniture producers
- Cost recovery and the crisis of service delivery in South Africa
- Review of schedules 4 and 5 of the constitution: executive summary
- Spatial information system for municipalities in South Africa
- The institutional crisis of the University of the Transkei
- Towards an institutional framework for managing agricultural export trade
- Democracy and governance review: Mandela's legacy 1994-1999
- Consolidating democracy and governance in South Africa
- Race and democratisation in South Africa: some reflections
- Public participation in South Africa as we enter the 21st century
- Decoding South Africa's 1999 electoral geography
- Democracy and governance in transition
- The benefits of information and communication technology in tele-education: a case study