Restoring the core?: central city decline and transformation in the South
SOURCE: Progress in Planning
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): I.Turok, L.Seeliger, J.Visagie
KEYWORDS: DEVELOPMENT, TOWNS
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10982
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/14751
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/14751
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): I.Turok, L.Seeliger, J.Visagie
KEYWORDS: DEVELOPMENT, TOWNS
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10982
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/14751
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/14751
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Central cities are vibrant and productive places because of the dense concentration of people, firms and supporting facilities. Yet their dynamism can be undermined by congestion, social tensions and poor urban management. South Africa???s four major city centres experienced tumultuous changes during the transition from apartheid and the exodus of many property owners, investors and occupiers to the suburbs. Buildings decayed, infrastructure collapsed, public health and safety deteriorated, and governance was disrupted by unauthorised activities. Despite the general neglect, signs of recovery have emerged and gathered momentum in recent years. The revival is fragile, partial and patchy in most cases, and dwarfed by scale of new investment in outlying economic nodes. The paper uses a resilience framework to examine how enterprising organisations have spurred regeneration by identifying opportunities for the adaptive reuse of redundant buildings and public spaces for affordable housing and social amenities. It also compares the extent, character and causes of the rebound across the four cities, demonstrating elements of continuity (bounce-back resilience) and transformation (bounce-forward resilience) in each case. Cape Town is characterised more by continuity and Johannesburg more by decline and transformation, with Pretoria and Durban in between. City centre recovery is attributed to a combination of pioneering private and public sector actions, albeit disjointed and uneven in their effectiveness. The paper concludes that central cities are relatively open incubators of economic and social progress, but also cauldrons of competing interests which create many dilemmas for decision-makers to negotiate, and which require coordinated attention and determination to realise their potential.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Towards slum-free cities: MDG impacts on South Africa's policies, strategies and activities so far
- Cities as drivers of development
- Towards sustainable cities: extending resilience with insights from vulnerability and transition theory
- Mass housing or better cities?
- Reducing spatial inequalities through better regulation
- Access to the city: place-making and development dynamics
- Creating sticky places: occupy urbanism, digital heritage and decolonisation
- Who is in the driving seat?: development cooperation and democracy
- The contested state of democracy in South Africa
- Knowledge-based aid: a four agency comparative study
- Sida, knowledge, learning and capacity
- Knowledge for development
- Introduction: globalisation and the world of work, a French-South African cross perspective
- Book review: Carlsson, J. & Wohlgemuth, L. (eds) (2000). Learning in development cooperation. Stockholm, Almqvist and Wicksell. ISBN 9122018964
- Fragments of democracy: nationalism, development and the state in Africa
- Development funding in SA 2000/01
- Educational research in the African development context: rediscovery, reconstruction and prospects
- Debating Castells and Carnoy on the network society
- Globalization and the social construction of reality: affirming or unmasking the "inevitable"?
- Poverty power and partnerships in educational development: a post-victimology perspective