The politics of decentralisation and donor funding in South Africa's rural water sector
SOURCE: Journal of Southern African Studies
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2003
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Galvin, A.Habib
KEYWORDS: FINANCING, KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE, NORTHERN PROVINCE, WATER MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 2690
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/7942
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7942
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2003
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Galvin, A.Habib
KEYWORDS: FINANCING, KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE, NORTHERN PROVINCE, WATER MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 2690
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/7942
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7942
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Decentralisation appeals to actors across the political spectrum and has become a cornerstone of development orthodoxy. Although the new South African government has adopted a range of policies that promote decentralisation, competing tendencies toward centralisation have become increasingly evident. This article examines how donors have supported decentralisation in South Africa, how they have affected the implementation of decentralisation policies, and what impact, if any, donors have had on the form of decentralisation. The implementation of decentralisation is considered in the context of the rural water sector, which has been a priority arena of decentralisation. Based on key informant interviews with 47 government, donor and NGO officials, we outline three donor-supported prograqmmes in Northern Province and KwaZulu-Natal. Our findings lead us to differentiate between community-oriented decentralisation, in practice they promote state-centric decentralisation. Not only does this reinforce the institutional bias of government, but it also undermines the original motivation and rationale for decentralisation. There are indications that some donors have begun to recognise this danger and are intervening to promote community-oriented decentralisation. However, given South Africa's structural realities, we conclude by questioning whether this is possible at the present historical juncture.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Audit of pension pay points in South Africa
- The politics of decentralisation and donor funding in South Africa's rural water sector
- Global sugar, regional water, and local people: EU sugar regime liberalisation, rural livelihoods, and the environment in the Incomati River Basin
- Review of DPLG donor co-ordination and management
- Institutional and stakeholder analysis: local, provincial and national level
- The impact of HIV/AIDS on land issues in Kwazulu-Natal province South Africa: case studies from Muden, Dondotha, Kwadumisa and Kwanyuswa
- Non governmental organisations and education in South Africa
- The politics of water management: the case of the Orange River development project
- Kwazulu-Natal programme for survivors of violence
- Development funding in SA 2000/01
- Feasibility study for a programme to support local economic development in the northern province: phase one report: executive summary
- Bloodwise? Knowledge and attitudes pertaining to HIV and blood donation in Durban
- Contemporary tourism at Dwesa-Cwebe
- Infrastructure in educare centres in KwaZulu-Natal
- Empowerment through service delivery
- The airport, the road and the school: infrastructure delivery in KwaZulu-Natal
- Discretionary fund projects of the reconstruction and development programme
- Land reform in South Africa 1994-2000: some reflections from KwaZulu-Natal
- Holding a rural crisis: land reform and politics at Impendle State Land, KwaZulu-Natal
- Investment into eco-tourism projects: KwaZulu-Natal coastal belt: South Africa