A systematic review on the meaning of the concept 'AIDS orphan': confusion over definitions and implications for care
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): L.Sherr, R.Varrall, J.Mueller, L.Richter, A.Wakhweya, M.Adato, M.Belsey, U.Chandan, S.Drimie, M.Haour-Knipe, V.Hosegood, J.Kimou, S.Madhavan, V.Mathambo, C.Desmond
KEYWORDS: HIV/AIDS, ORPHANS, ORPHANS AND VULNERABLE CHILDREN (OVC)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 5439
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/9283
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/9283
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Global publications on the international AIDS epidemic report on the existence of an ever-increasing number of orphans and vulnerable children. It has been suggested that by the end of this decade there will be in excess of 25 million AIDS orphans globally, an issue which will require understanding and organisation of long-term medical, psychological and social support. This study provides a systematic review to examine the use, overuse and misuse of the term orphan and explores the benefits and limitations of this approach. It then summarises the knowledge on orphans to date. Using a search strategy of published studies and recent conference abstracts, 383 papers were identified where the concept of AIDS and Orphan was raised. The papers were systematically coded and reviewed to understand when and how a child is labelled an orphan, and to summarise the effect of orphanhood on outcome measures, most notably psychologically and physically. All controlled studies published prior to 2006 were reviewed. A consistent picture of negative effects of parental death (however defined) on a wide range of physical, socioeconomic and psychological outcomes were recorded. Seventeen studies met criteria for in-depth review (empirical, fully published, control group). The majority of studies are cross-sectional (two are longitudinal) and employ a very wide array of measures both standardised and study specific. This detailed analysis shows a mixed picture on outcome. Although most studies report some negative effects, there are often no differences and some evidence of protective effects from quality of subsequent care and economic assistance. The lack of consistent measures and the blurring of definitions are stumbling blocks in this area.-
Related Research Outputs:
- The use of implementation research networks on orphans and vulnerable children to encourage research-driven policies: the case of Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe
- Building resilience: a rights-based approach to children and HIV/AIDS in Africa
- A monitoring dilemma: orphans and children made vulnerable by HIV/AIDS
- Interventions for orphans and vulnerable children at four project sites in South Africa
- No small issue: children and families: universal action now
- Editorial: 'what now, what next': reflecting on the vulnerability of children and youth in the context of human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
- Targeting AIDS orphans and child-headed households?: a perspective from national surveys in South Africa, 1995-2005
- Family ties: reconstructing the care of vulnerable children: the 'orphan' label doesn't help
- The quality of material care provided by grandparents of their orphaned grandchildren in the context of HIV/AIDS and poverty: a study of Kopanong municipality, Free State
- AIDS orphan tourism: a threat to young children in residential care
- Editorial: countdown to zero: only possible with 100% support for children and families
- HIV+ and HIV- youth living in group homes in South Africa need more psychosocial support
- A study of descriptive data for orphans and non-orphans on key criteria of economic vulnerability in two municipalities in South Africa
- Sickness, death and poverty - our bequest to orphans
- Slipping through the safety net
- Child-headed households: dissecting our understanding of who is at risk
- The development, implementation and evaluation of interventions for the care of orphans and vulnerable children in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe: A literature review of evidence-based interventions for home-based child-centred development
- Views and attitudes of members of the Mamelodi community regarding the care and support of orphans: findings of a survey and a series of in-depth interviews
- What does it take to care?
- Defining orphaned and vulnerable children