Dynamics of income inequality and poverty in post-independence Namibia
OUTPUT TYPE: Conference or seminar papers
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): S.Levine, B.Roberts
KEYWORDS: INCOME MOBILITY, INEQUALITY, NAMIBIA, POVERTY
Intranet: HSRC Library: shelf number 5476
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/5214
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/5214
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): S.Levine, B.Roberts
KEYWORDS: INCOME MOBILITY, INEQUALITY, NAMIBIA, POVERTY
Intranet: HSRC Library: shelf number 5476
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/5214
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/5214
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study the changes in the distribution of incomes in Namibia since Independence in 1990 and the effects on poverty. We first use micro-econometric techniques to improve comparability between the expenditure data in two household surveys conducted in 1993/1994 and 2003/2004. We then go on to compute a series of measures for poverty, inequality and polarisation. The results point to a small yet statistically significant decrease in the incidence of poverty over the period and to small but insignificant increases in inequality and polarisation. Our findings show that Namibia is among the most unequal and polarised societies in the world. The analysis also shows that partition by educational attainment has become the key determinant of income inequality in Namibia, which we explain by the improvements in access to education after Independence and increasing returns to education associated with the opening of the labour market. The high but falling importance of between-group inequality by linguistic grouping is indicative of some progress in closing the welfare gaps between the country's different ethnic groups. In a dynamic decomposition analysis we attribute this progress to demographic changes rather than changes in relative mean incomes. We find no evidence of regional convergence (nor divergence) but show that income growth has tended to be more 'pro-poor' in urban areas than in rural areas. Income growth in households reliant on state pensions has been more than outweighed by redistribution of incomes away from these households contributing to a significant increase in poverty levels.-
Related Research Outputs:
- A q-squared approach to pro-poor policy formulation in Namibia
- A review of poverty and inequality in Namibia
- Social income in South Africa, an economy marred by high unemployment, poverty and extreme inequality
- Robust estimates of changes in poverty and inequality in post-independence Namibia
- Robust estimates of changes in poverty and inequality in post-independence Namibia
- Status of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: implications for policy and impact evaluation
- Book review: Bhorat, H., Leibbrandt, M., Maziya, M., Van der Berg, S. & Woolard, I. (eds) (2001) Fighting poverty: labour markets and inequality in South Africa. Cape Town: UCT Press
- An overview of poverty and inequality in South Africa
- Poverty and inequality reduction strategies for South Africa
- Women, culture and inequality: human rights and the feminisation of poverty in South Africa
- A framework for analysing poverty and inequality in GIS
- Rac(e)ing poverty and punishment in South Africa, 1920-1970
- 'Empty stomachs, empty pockets': poverty and inequality in post-apartheid South Africa
- Confronting the divide: attitudes to inequality
- Determinants of income mobility and household poverty dynamics in South Africa
- Determinants of income mobility and household poverty dynamics in South Africa
- The happy transition?: attitudes to poverty and inequality after a decade of democracy
- The provincial indices of multiple deprivation for South Africa 2001
- The provincial indices of multiple deprivation for South Africa 2001: technical report
- Poverty in South Africa: extent of access to food and income