Measuring disability in censuses: the case of South Africa
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2009
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Schneider, P.Dasappa, N.Khan, A.Khan
KEYWORDS: DISABILITIES, DISCRIMINATION
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 5945
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/4727
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4727
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This paper reports on findings from the South African census content research to develop a disability set of questions for Census 2011. The findings of this research are used to determine, firstly, whether the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) Short Set (revised for the South African context) is an appropriate set of questions to measure disability in Censuses, and, secondly, whether it is sufficient to ask about basic domains in order to identify the population at risk of experiencing disability related disadvantage and discrimination. The methodology is a national survey using a population based representative sample. The focus of the research were two sets of questions: the first being the Short Set for Census proposed by the WG, and the second being the disability questions used in the 2001 South African Census. The survey comprised three questionnaires: a Household Questionnaire with one member of the household responding for the whole household; a Living Standard Measure (LSM) questionnaire administered to the same person about the whole household; and an adult questionnaire administered to all household members 15 years and older who could respond for themselves. The findings support the use of the revised WG Short Set as an appropriate Census measures. It captures a broader and more inclusive population as having difficulties compared to that captured on the Census 2001 disability question, without excluding the Census 2001 population captured as disabled. The results are inconclusive with regard to the sufficiency of basic domains as a measure of the population at risk. Further testing is required to understand how people understand and respond to questions such as 'do you have difficulties in taking care of your household responsibilities or in your day to day work/schoolwork?'.-
Related Research Outputs:
- 'Satan is holding your tongue back': stuttering as moral failure
- Disparities in attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWA): a nationwide study
- Progress report on the disability assessment tool
- Disability assessment tool
- Disability and development
- Disability and development: All dressed up and nowhere to go?
- Women and disability: Exploring the interface of multiple disadvantage
- Expectations and allocations: the politics of disability grants in a psychiatric clinic in Khayelitsha
- What is disability?
- Defining orphaned and vulnerable children
- 'Nothing without us': disability inclusion and the South African mass media
- Overcoming the legacy of discrimination in South Africa: final report
- Stigma, discrimination and the implications for people living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa
- The impact of maternal disability on the well-being of children (a pilot study)
- South Africa
- Marginalised and demonised: lesbians and equality - perceptions of people in a local Western Cape community
- Zip zip my brain harts
- Disability and social change: a South African agenda
- When is it merciful to act corruptly
- Disablity and the environment