Transformative constitutionalism, power and consensus: Are the courts in charge?
SOURCE: State of the Nation South Africa 2016: who is in charge?: mandates, accountability and contestations in the South African state
OUTPUT TYPE: Chapter in Monograph
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2016
TITLE AUTHOR(S): N.Bohler-Muller, B.Bo
SOURCE EDITOR(S): D.Plaatjies, M.Chitiga-Mabugu, C.Hongoro, T.Meyiwa, M.Nkondo, F.Nyamnjoh
KEYWORDS: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, CONSTITUTIONS, DEMOCRACY
DEPARTMENT: African Institute of South Africa (AISA)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 9055
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/9375
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/9375
OUTPUT TYPE: Chapter in Monograph
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2016
TITLE AUTHOR(S): N.Bohler-Muller, B.Bo
SOURCE EDITOR(S): D.Plaatjies, M.Chitiga-Mabugu, C.Hongoro, T.Meyiwa, M.Nkondo, F.Nyamnjoh
KEYWORDS: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, CONSTITUTIONS, DEMOCRACY
DEPARTMENT: African Institute of South Africa (AISA)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 9055
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/9375
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/9375
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Supporting a very energetic rendition of the constitutional state, this chapter addresses some of the issues mentioned above. Specifically, it asks whether the courts are `in charge? of the transformation of the state, as called for by the supremacy of the Constitution. More directly, it asks how and to what extent the courts can or should be 'in charge' of the transformation of South Africa towards a more just society, as required by the comprehensive measures included in the NDP: Vision 2030. Firstly, we inquire whether the court's pursuit of transformative constitutionalism would necessarily weaken the separation-of-powers doctrine. Secondly, we ask to what extent the debate between 'judicial modesty and restraint' and 'judicial activism' determines the ability of the courts to pursue the practice of transformative constitutionalism in an effective way. Finally, we consider whether the apex courts (and especially the CC) are able to pursue this desirable transformative constitutionalism without the existence of a comprehensive 'social contract' as called for by the NDP in Vision 2030.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Constitutional democracy in South Africa: fanciful ideal or tangible reality?
- Who is in the driving seat?: development cooperation and democracy
- The contested state of democracy in South Africa
- Democracy in Africa: fragile and necessary but uncertain
- Empowerment and transformation in South Africa
- Democracy in Africa: moving beyond a difficult legacy
- Ten-year review presidential project: nation building and reconciliation: the public service commission: the public protector
- Book review: Legum, C. (2001) Africa since independence. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.105pp. & Abrahamsen, R. Disciplining democracy: development discourse and good governance in Africa. London: Zed Books. 168pp. & Salih, M. (2001) African democracies and African politics. London: Pluto Press. 234pp
- Fragments of democracy: nationalism, development and the state in Africa
- Reconstruction and the reciprocal other: the philosophy and practice of "Ubuntu" and democracy in African society
- Democracy and governance review: Mandela's legacy 1994-1999
- Consolidating democracy and governance in South Africa
- Race and democratisation in South Africa: some reflections
- Public participation in South Africa as we enter the 21st century
- Decoding South Africa's 1999 electoral geography
- Democracy and governance in transition
- Democracy, civic knowledge and social issues
- Teledemocracy in South Africa
- Profiles of party political support
- Facts, fiction and fabrication?: service delivery in South Africa under Mandela