"We are equal"!: gender constructions in a group of middle-class South African Muslim couples
SOURCE: Gender Issues
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): E.Lesch, M.Parker
KEYWORDS: GENDER EQUALITY, MARRIAGE, MUSLIMS, PARTNERSHIPS (PERSONAL)
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11023
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/14966
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/14966
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): E.Lesch, M.Parker
KEYWORDS: GENDER EQUALITY, MARRIAGE, MUSLIMS, PARTNERSHIPS (PERSONAL)
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11023
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/14966
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/14966
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This study, situated within a social constructionist theoretical framework, explored how a group of South African, middle-class, Indian and Malay Muslim, married couples constructed gender in their relationships. Most of the studies that have been conducted on gender in Muslim marriages focus exclusively on womens issues and included only female participants. Similarly, the few gender studies available on South African Muslims highlight the experiences or rights of women and relied on female participants. None of these studies incorporated dyadic, or couple data. We adopted a feminist social constructionist framework to explore how eight South African Muslim couples between the ages of 23 and 36 co-constructed and negotiated gender in the daily practices of their relationship. We conducted 12 (totalling nearly 24 h) joint interviews and used a thematic analysis method to analyse the data. We found that the couples constructed men and women as essentially different and complementary, and that they strongly proclaimed their relationships as equitable. Participants felt sense of equality seemed to be grounded in perceptions of their gendered roles as chosen, negotiable, and appreciated rather than enforced, compulsory and taken for granted. We conclude that participants gender ideas and practices enabled them to feel, claim and/or negotiate agentic positions in their relationships with their partners, but some of their ideas and practices may limit agency and scope of experiences.-
Related Research Outputs:
- On marrying, mixing and everything else: the changing face of family life in South Africa
- The same-sex marriage complex in South Africa: some conceptual, gendered and rights-based interpretations
- Spirit of iNgcugce
- Prospective examination of marital status as a determinant of sexual risk-taking behavior among inmates in KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga provinces, South Africa
- Does marital status matter in an HIV hyperendemic country?: findings from the 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour survey
- Same-race marriages still the rule rather that the exception
- Is marriage a dying institution in South Africa?: exploring changes in marriage in the context of ilobolo payments
- Marriage and cohabitation in South Africa: an enriching explanation?
- The relationship between sex ratios and marriage rates in South Africa
- Results of a couples-based randomized controlled trial aimed to increase testing for HIV
- Power relations in sexual agreements among male couples in southern Africa
- Navigating intimate sexual partnerships in an era of HIV: dimensions of couple relationship quality and satisfaction among adults in Eswatini and linkages to HIV risk
- Attitudes towards marriage in postapartheid South Africa
- Intimate partner violence among male couples in South Africa and Namibia
- Social influence and uptake of couples HIV testing and counselling in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- "I think it's communication and trust and sharing everything": qualitative evidence for a model of healthy intimate relationships in black women living with HIV and men in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa