A baseline assessment for future impact evaluation of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: summary report
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2021
TITLE AUTHOR(S): C.Ndinda, C.Hongoro, D.Labadarios, T.Mokhele, E.Khalema, G.Weir-Smith, M.Douglas, S.Ngandu, W.Parker, F.Tshitangano, T.Maluleke, T.Manyaapelo, S.Zama, N.Kheswa, A.Ngubeni, M.Moloto, F.Rathogwa, A.Lekodeba, P.Dlamini, Z.Dlamini, A.Gcwabe, L.Meiring, N.Mahlangu, D.Chilwane
KEYWORDS: HOUSING DELIVERY, IMPACT ASSESSMENT, INEQUALITY, INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES), Equitable Education and Economies (IED), Public Health, Societies and Belonging (HSC), Deputy CEO: Research (DCEO_R), Deputy CEO: Research (ERKC), Deputy CEO: Research (CGI)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11947
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/15968
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/15968
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This study reveals that informal settlements cannot be considered as temporary transit settlements of individuals seeking opportunities in urban areas. They are home to the urban poor who neither have access to subsidised housing nor to the private rental market, which remains beyond their reach. While the UISP has been valuable, there is a need for a policy on the upgrading of informal settlements. As international and local experience suggests, effective upgrading programmes are those where communities are involved from the planning to the implementation of the programme. The current design of the UISP does not provide an indication of stakeholder involvement in its design. The ex post design of the Theory of Change (TOC) and the logical framework reinforce the low level of stakeholder participation in the design of the UISP. Revisions to the UISP need to ensure that a wide range of stakeholders are involved in its formulation because when targeted beneficiaries can identify with the programme, then participation in its implementation and success becomes easier to achieve.-
Related Research Outputs:
- A baseline assessment for future impact evaluation of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: study report
- A baseline study for future impact evaluation for informal settlements targeted for upgrading: final data delivery report
- Baseline assessment for future impact evaluation of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: draft: final fieldwork report
- Conflict re-emerges at Crossroads: new shacklords battle the city
- Local governance and social conflict: implications for piloting South Africa's new housing plan in Cape Town's informal settlements
- Land management in Diepkloof: land shortage, participation and contestation
- Towards measuring success with human settlements delivery
- A rapid verification study on the informal settlements and backyard shacks' backlog and trends within the Eastern Cape
- From informal settlements to brick structures: housing trends in post-apartheid South Africa
- The state of South African cities 2011
- Backyard shacks and the urban housing crisis: stopgap or prototype solution
- Linking universities and marginalised communities: South African case studies of innovation focused on livelihoods in informal settings
- Report on a baseline assessment for future impact evaluation of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: final report
- Report on a baseline assessment for future impact evaluation of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: summary report
- Status of informal settlements targeted for upgrading: implications for policy and impact evaluation
- Upgrading dense informal settlements by building upwards: lessons from an informal settlement in Durban, South Africa
- Informal backyard housing development at a crossroads
- Covid-19 amplifies urban inequalities
- Book review: Bhorat, H., Leibbrandt, M., Maziya, M., Van der Berg, S. & Woolard, I. (eds) (2001) Fighting poverty: labour markets and inequality in South Africa. Cape Town: UCT Press
- An overview of poverty and inequality in South Africa