Attitudes toward abortion, social welfare programs, and gender roles in the U.S. and South Africa
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): E.A.Mosley, B.A.Anderson, L.H.Harris, P.J.Fleming, A.J.Schulz
KEYWORDS: ABORTION, ATTITUDES, GENDER
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11036
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/14970
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/14970
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Public abortion attitudes are important predictors of abortion stigma and accessibility, even in legal settings like the U.S. and South Africa. With data from the U.S. General Social Survey and South African Social Attitudes Survey, we used ordinal logistic regressions to measure whether abortion acceptability (in cases of poverty and fetal anomaly) is related to attitudes about social welfare programs and gender roles, then assessed differences by race/ethnicity and education. Social welfare program attitudes did not correlate with abortion acceptability in the U.S., but in South Africa, greater support for income equalization and increased government spending on the poor correlated with lower abortion acceptability in circumstances of poverty. This was significant for Black African and higher educated South Africans. In the U.S., egalitarian gender role attitudes correlated with higher acceptability of abortion in circumstances of poverty and fetal anomaly This was significant for White and less educated Americans. In South Africa, egalitarian gender role attitudes correlated with higher abortion acceptability for fetal anomaly overall and among Black and less educated respondents, but among non-Black South Africans they correlated with higher abortion acceptability in circumstances of poverty. These results suggest abortion attitudes are distinctly related to socioeconomic and gender ideology depending ones national context, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Reducing abortion stigma will require community-based approaches rooted in intersectional reproductive justice frameworks.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion: are there gender differences?
- Abortion attitudes among South Africans: findings from the 2013 social attitudes survey
- Gender analysis of Department of Health policy documents
- Education, ethnicity, gender, and social transformation in Israel and South Africa
- Voters' evaluation of the 2000 local government elections in South Africa
- Rethinking gender, empowerment and development
- Constructions of whiteness, gender, class and sexuality in South African English-medius men's and women's magazines
- Gender equality and Curriculum 2005
- Fertility: current South African issues of poverty, HIV/AIDS & youth: seminar proceedings
- Women and disability: Exploring the interface of multiple disadvantage
- Whose right is it anyway?: equality and conflicts between state policy, culture and rights in South Africa
- Guidelines to enhance the representation and participation of women in local government in South Africa
- Who will woo her on 14 April?: targeting the female electorate
- Fertility, poverty and gender in South Africa: paper 2
- One man, one megawatt, one women one candle: women, gender, and energy in South Africa
- Responses to gender-based violence in schools
- Education and health facilities (including HIV/AIDS and gender)
- Education and health facilities (including HIV/AIDS and gender)
- Women and employment
- Report 2: national stakeholder workshop on gender, culture and rights