Gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion: are there gender differences?
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2009
TITLE AUTHOR(S): C.J.Patel, L.Johns
KEYWORDS: ABORTION, GENDER
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 9942
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/11249
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/11249
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This study examines gender differences in gender role attitudes and attitudes to abortion in a sample of 141 undergraduate students. Religion and religiosity were treated as covariates. Using the short version of Spence and Helmreich???s (1978) Attitudes toWomen Scale (AWS) taken from Spence and Hahn [Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude to change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17-34] and the abortion attitudes scale developed by Stets and Leik [Stets, J. E., & Leik, R. K. (1993). Attitudes about abortion and varying attitude structures. Social Science Research, 22, 265-282], we found that females have more liberal attitudes to women and show stronger approval for women's autonomy in abortion decision-making. Given the low internal consistency of this three-item subscale, responses to the individual items were analyzed. More males than females feel that the father should have the right to prevent the mother from having an abortion. Most of the students indicate that the woman should have to tell the father before having an abortion and most disagree that the abortion is entirely a woman's decision. There were no gender differences on the moral acceptability and availability subscales. The overall results reflect somewhat conservative attitudes to women, and seemingly contradictory findings on the abortion issue in this sample of university students. Although they endorse the availability of abortion, at the same time they find it morally unacceptable and show weak support for women's autonomy in this decision. The implications of these findings for the advancement of women's rights in this country are discussed.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Attitudes toward abortion, social welfare programs, and gender roles in the U.S. and South Africa
- Gender analysis of Department of Health policy documents
- Education, ethnicity, gender, and social transformation in Israel and South Africa
- Voters' evaluation of the 2000 local government elections in South Africa
- Rethinking gender, empowerment and development
- Constructions of whiteness, gender, class and sexuality in South African English-medius men's and women's magazines
- Gender equality and Curriculum 2005
- Fertility: current South African issues of poverty, HIV/AIDS & youth: seminar proceedings
- Women and disability: Exploring the interface of multiple disadvantage
- Whose right is it anyway?: equality and conflicts between state policy, culture and rights in South Africa
- Guidelines to enhance the representation and participation of women in local government in South Africa
- Who will woo her on 14 April?: targeting the female electorate
- Fertility, poverty and gender in South Africa: paper 2
- One man, one megawatt, one women one candle: women, gender, and energy in South Africa
- Responses to gender-based violence in schools
- Education and health facilities (including HIV/AIDS and gender)
- Education and health facilities (including HIV/AIDS and gender)
- Women and employment
- Report 2: national stakeholder workshop on gender, culture and rights
- Session on gender, land rights and inheritance: comments