Troubling 'race' as a category of explanation in social science research and analysis
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2018
TITLE AUTHOR(S): S.Vally, E.Motala
KEYWORDS: RACE, RACISM, SOCIAL RESEARCH, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIAL ATTITUDES SURVEY (SASAS)
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11051
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/14976
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/14976
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
In this article, we problematise the use of the concept of race as a category of social analysis and commentary as it is used by academics, government, other social analysts and commentators. We argue that the concept has, regrettably, been used in a cavalier way in political, social and educational studies to explain matters in ways that are reminiscent of apartheid science. While the concept of race is critically important for understanding the impact and effects of the strategies, policies and practices of racist states on individuals, communities and societies, globally, and for thinking about the sociopolitical effects of racism, discussions about race are often trapped in ideas that have the effect of extending the very consequences that struggles against racism have sought to eradicate. Such approaches to the concept of race are insouciant about the potential for deepening the racist vocabularies, the metaphors, descriptions and stereotypes prevalent in the racist categories employed by the apartheid state and its ideologues. While racism remains highly prevalent and visible, it is critically important that the complexities of the use of race be recognised so that its usages do not have the effect of promoting racist political and economic systems and the discourses and practices associated with them. Explanations that use race as an analytical category must ensure that they do not provide justification for the ideologies and power of racist systems.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Race and racism in post-apartheid South Africa: a book project
- Understanding the structure of data when planning for analysis: application of hierarchical linear model
- Strategy for gaining access to conduct research in the informal settlement
- Research methodology (approaches) and the implementation of research findings
- Social science research and the challenge of AIDS: a reflexive participatory research approach
- From weather changes to climate shifts: the experience of developing a social attitudes survey for South Africa
- Population training and research in South Africa
- "Inputs of social scientists are critical"
- Role of social sciences vital to development
- Emerging future issues in HIV/AIDS social research
- Pursuing 'social science that makes a difference' - how the HSRC sees its mission
- Dilemmas of social science policy research in Africa: reflections on experiences of the Human Sciences Research Council in South Africa
- Translating research into policy: the case of orphans and vulnerable children in South Africa
- Has social science been a religion?: the dilemma of sociological analysis of religion
- Where the local meets the global: does social science have an identity?
- Health and social scientists need to weigh in
- The socioeconomics of subsistence farmers and the contribution of the social sciences to agricultural development
- Survey module: questionnaires and questionnaire construction and pretesting
- Production and dissemination of knowledge: how global can it be?
- Book review: Reddy, V., Sandfort, T., Rispel, L. (eds). 2009. From social silence to social science: same-sex sexuality, HIV & AIDS and gender in South Africa: conference proceedings. Cape Town: HSRC Press. 252 pp. ISBN: 978-0-7969-2276-2