When is the conflict over? Truth, acknowledgement and transitional justice in South Africa and Northern Ireland
OUTPUT TYPE: Conference or seminar papers
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2003
TITLE AUTHOR(S): J.M.Cherry
KEYWORDS: NORTHERN IRELAND, TRANSFORMATION
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 2632
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/7998
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7998
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2003
TITLE AUTHOR(S): J.M.Cherry
KEYWORDS: NORTHERN IRELAND, TRANSFORMATION
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 2632
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/7998
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7998
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
In this paper, I explore the concept of transitional justice through a comparison between South Africa and Northern Ireland. Empirically, the focus is on the period of transition in each country, after the suspension of armed struggle in each case, in terms of the Pretoria Minute of August 1990 and the Good Friday Agreement of April 1998 respectively. Each period is examined and compared with relation to the following themes: Self-defence/community defence; policing, community policing and social order; territorial control and local power; weapons control, military discipline and demilitarization. Conceptually, the focus is on accountability for violations committed during such transition periods; and in the post-transition period, how transitional justice mechanisms deal with such violations; the legitimacy of the justice system during and after the transition; and community policing initiatives during the transition. The difficulty of establishing a consensual truth about violations committed during transition periods does not detract from two important processes which transitional justice mechanisms attempt to address: the acknowledgement of responsibility for such violations by those who perpetrated them; and the holding to account of the perpetrators. The process of acknowledgement is integrally linked to the unveiling and establishment of the truth about the past; while the process of accountability can take a variety of forms, from conditional amnesty and full public disclosure, to community-based processes of reconciliation and restorative justice, to legal prosecution and punitive justice. It is concluded that whatever the nature of these processes, their importance in enabling societies which have been torn apart by violent conflict, to come to terms with their past, cannot be underestimated-
Related Research Outputs:
- Empowerment and transformation in South Africa
- Non governmental organisations and education in South Africa
- Further education and training institutions and communities at work: case studies of five community college models
- Further education and training in South Africa - a quest for redress, social justice and economic development
- Empowerment through economic transformation
- Reconstruction and the reciprocal other: the philosophy and practice of "Ubuntu" and democracy in African society
- Democracy and governance review: Mandela's legacy 1994-1999
- Consolidating democracy and governance in South Africa
- Globalising and internationalising the higher education sector: challenges and contradictions in less industrialised countries
- Public transport in the changing South Africa, 1994-2000
- Governance and institutional trust in South Africa: November 1999-September 2000
- Facts, fiction and fabrication?: service delivery in South Africa under Mandela
- Perception of service and infrastructure under President Mbeki
- Women marching into the 21st century: wathint' abafazi, wathint' imbokodo
- South Africa: a transformative state?
- Targeting and mapping the needs of the poor
- Africa in the contemporary world
- Identity? Theory, politics, history
- Facts, fiction or fabrication? Service delivery, 1994-1999
- Preface