Are the powers of traditional leaders in South Africa compatible with women's equal rights?: three conceptual arguments
SOURCE: Human Rights Review
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2005
TITLE AUTHOR(S): K.A.Bentley
KEYWORDS: TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES, WOMEN'S RIGHTS
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 3679
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/6930
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/6930
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2005
TITLE AUTHOR(S): K.A.Bentley
KEYWORDS: TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES, WOMEN'S RIGHTS
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 3679
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/6930
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/6930
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This paper is about conflicts of rights, and the particularly difficult challenges that such conflicts present when they entail women's equality and claims of cultural recognition. South Africa since 1994 has presented a series of challenging--but by no means unique--circumstances many of which entail conflicting claims of rights. The central aim of this paper is to make sense of the idea that the institution of traditional leadership can be sustained--and indeed given new, more concrete pow-ers--in a democracy; and to explore the implications that this has for women's equality and equal human rights. This is a particularly pertinent question in the South African context, and I think it is worth reiterating from the outset that there is a distinct impression that women's equality is always "up for grabs" when other, perhaps more powerful interests, come into play, in a way that would be unacceptable for other aspects of identity, and therefore signifiers of equality. It would be inconceivable, for example, to countenance a claim for a hierarchical racial arrangement in a given community, no matter how deeply culturally entrenched that arrangement was, and regardless of how much support it (ostensibly) had from the community concerned. I think therefore that we are obliged to ask difficult questions about the new legislation on traditional leadership, and to put it under the microscope of political theory in assessing the claim that this is one way of recognizing people's rights and freedoms in a new democracy.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Are the powers of traditional leaders compatible with women's equal rights?: three conceptual arguments (yes, no and maybe)
- Longitudinal study: the effect of the legislated powers of traditional authorities on rural women's rights in South Africa: baseline report
- Baseline report for the longitudinal study: the effect of the legislated powers of traditional authorities on rural women's rights in South Africa
- Are the powers of traditional leaders in South Africa compatible with women's equal rights?: three conceptual arguments
- Local government, traditional authorities and land tenure reform in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- The global debate on multiculturalism and women's human rights in South Africa
- Women in the civil service: has South Africa got the balance right?
- Containing the chiefs: the ANC and traditional leaders in the eastern Cape, South Africa
- Women's human rights & the feminisation of poverty in South Africa
- 'All mouth and no trousers'
- Men, take a stand
- The 'great' debate
- 'Classify and conquer': Friedrich Max Muller, indigenous religious traditions, and imperial comparative religion
- Traditional healers on board to fight HIV/AIDS
- The great leap sideways: gender, culture and rights after 10 years of demcracy in South Africa
- Report on gender, culture and rights: new approaches to making women's rights a reality
- Democracy compromised: chiefs and the politics of land in South Africa
- Rural development in South Africa: tensions between democracy and traditional authority
- Traditional healers' perceptions of smokeless tobacco use and health in the Limpopo province of South Africa
- Tripping up: AIDS, pharmaceuticals and intellectual property in South Africa