Policy researchers and policy impact
SOURCE: Africanus
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): J.Carter
KEYWORDS: POLICY FORMULATION, POLICY IMPLEMENTATION, RESEARCH
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 5669
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/5027
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/5027
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): J.Carter
KEYWORDS: POLICY FORMULATION, POLICY IMPLEMENTATION, RESEARCH
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 5669
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/5027
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/5027
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
A large industry of research organisations produce evidence that public and policy makers can use to judge the legitimacy of policies and hold government to account for policy promises. This industry consists of organisations that describe themselves as independent and non-partisan, many of which define themselves as think-tanks. Estimates of when they originated vary, but the literature agrees on at least three phases of think-tanks. Many writers suggest that a large dose of ideology, rather than evidence, drives the recommendations of think-tanks. There are many ways in which to define think-tanks - including according to type and purpose - and non-partisanship may be a misnomer. The direct influence that think-tanks make on policy and its implementation is difficult to determine, and is often described as a function of relationships, research, and the context in which the research is produced. Six key tendencies of think-tanks in South Africa are noted. The article concludes with comments about research and its value.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Policy research: surveys work best if balanced by in-depth qualitative studies
- The elusiveness of integration: policy discources on open and distance learning in the 1990s
- The interface between research and policy dialogue: symbolic or substantive
- The interface between research and policy dialogue: substantive or symbolic?
- Improving the links between research, policy and implementation
- Science and technology policy in transition countries: experience of South Africa
- Putting research into policy and practice through partnership building, networking and information dissemination: the role of the SAHARA network
- Bridging the research policy divide: YPI in SA
- Policy coherence: meanings, concepts and frameworks
- Putting research on education and poverty into practice: strategies for education and poverty research
- Policy research tool
- Developing an HIV/AIDS policy: content, process, challenges and implementation
- Getting a GRIPP on policies: turning research into policy and practice
- Proposed guidelines for a workplace health promotion policy and implementation framework
- IEC state of democracy survey 2012
- African scholars finding their voices
- Care worlds in context: prospective perspectives for research, policy development and public deliberation
- Policy imperatives and care
- Evidence-based deliberation and evidence-informed policy development
- A booklet for policy makers: scientific evidence to help guide policy