No evidence of a dependency culture in South Africa
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2007
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Noble, P.Ntshongwana
KEYWORDS: PUBLIC OPINION, SOCIAL GRANTS, SOCIAL SERVICES, SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIAL ATTITUDES SURVEY (SASAS)
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Intranet: HSRC Library: shelf number 6567
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/4067
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4067
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
The roots of this debate go back many centuries to notions of the 'undeserving poor' entrenched in pre-welfare state Britain. However, the more recent roots are to be found in neo-liberal thought which emerged in the 1980s, particularly in the US, spreading to any state which offers cash transfers as part of its anti-poverty armoury and which has concerns that expenditure on state transfers is becoming a strain on the national fiscus. It is a disingenuous thesis. Its starting point is that the poor are responsible for their own poverty and are inherently indolent, preferring to rely on state support than entering the labour market. It ignores the role social grants can play in restoring dignity to the unemployed and in helping place the unemployed in a better position to seek employment. Worst of all it flies in the face of evidence that the unemployed, far from being feckless, have a strong attachment to the labour market, and would much prefer the opportunity to support themselves through paid work if the opportunity presents itself. Though the spectre of the `dependency culture? is most commonly raised by rightwing opponents of states espousing social democratic values in the northern hemisphere, its proponents have found sympathetic ears in South Africa. Often we hear it said that in South Africa social grants foster dependency and that people should be given a `hand-up?not a `hand-out? The view is often taken that a social safety net in the form of grants is anti-development, and is even antipathetic to home-grown anti-poverty solutions. This is far from the truth ? to be opposed to social grants for the unemployed, is to be aligned with western neo-liberals found in anglo-saxon states such as the US and to a lesser degree the UK. Research from developed countries which do provide a social security safety net has shown no evidence of a dependency culture. But what about the situation in South Africa?-
Related Research Outputs:
- No sign of a dependency culture in South Africa
- Matching the demand: providing social grants
- The glue that binds or divides: social trust in South Africa
- Affirmative action
- Attitudes towards racial redress in South Africa
- Public perceptions of local government
- Youth voices in South Africa: echoes in the age of hope
- Towards a democratic definition of poverty: socially perceived necessities in South Africa
- South Africans' participation in local politics and government
- Age of hope or anxiety?: dynamics of the fear of crime in South Africa
- Ten years into democracy: how South Africans view their world and themselves
- Social grant for youth - some policy options: framework on social security for youth in South Africa
- Choosing good neighbours: social tolerance and prejudice
- Public relationship with science in South Africa: tabulation report based on the 2013 round of the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS)
- Lone mothers, social security and dignity
- Challenging corruption: changes in the public recognition of corruption as a societal priority in South Africa
- Social assistance and dependency in South Africa: an analysis of attitudes to paid work and social grants
- Protest blues: public opinion on the policing of protest in South Africa
- Minding the protest: attitudes towards different forms of protest action in contemporary South Africa
- A survey of attitudes towards and use of cellular phones