Service plans as accountability mechanisms: evidence from the South African Public Service
SOURCE: Administratio Publica
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2010
TITLE AUTHOR(S): Z.Tshandu
KEYWORDS: PUBLIC SERVICES SECTOR, SERVICE INDUSTRIES, STANDARDS
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 6607
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/4008
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4008
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2010
TITLE AUTHOR(S): Z.Tshandu
KEYWORDS: PUBLIC SERVICES SECTOR, SERVICE INDUSTRIES, STANDARDS
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 6607
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/4008
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4008
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
This article documents and assesses the process of formulating and submitting Service Delivery Improvement Plans (SDIPs) over the 2006/7 financial year. Given the emphasis on citizen orientation and accountability of the Batho Pele framework, the article examines the effectiveness and utility of the SDIPs submitted to the Department of Public Service and Administration by national and provincial departments. The process points to improvements in both the compliance rate and the quality of the submissions as they show a heightened consciousness of the Batho Pele framework. However, there are also limitations in that the SDIPs focus primarily on internal customers, without reaching out to citizens, the nearest point of delivery, they also lack measurable standards, and contain limited or no specification of how targeted improvements will be attained. These limitations reduce many of the SDIPs to a statement of objectives, rather than coherent improvement plans, with no cognisance of issues of administrative justice and access to information. The article emphasise the need for the centre to play a monitoring role and to support implementation, if the process is to be sustainable, given the absence of the requisite capacity to formulate standards within Departments.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Facts, fiction and fabrication?: service delivery in South Africa under Mandela
- Perception of service and infrastructure under President Mbeki
- Service delivery perceptions during Mandela rule, 1994-1999
- At full speed the tiger cubs stumbled: lessons from South East Asia about sustainable public service delivery
- Harnessing traditional governance in Southern Africa
- Is there value for money in public sector delivery?
- Looking for empathy in the public service: an evaluation of service plans
- Overcoming constraints on the delivery of services to children and young people
- Ten-year review presidential project: nation building and reconciliation: the public service commission: the public protector
- Cost recovery and the crisis of service delivery in South Africa
- An investigation of wage levels and wage inequality in the South African public sector: findings from the labour force survey, September 2001
- Review of schedules 4 and 5 of the constitution: executive summary
- Public appraisal of social and economic infrastructure delivery
- The politics of water management: the case of the Orange River development project
- Democracy and governance review: Mandela's legacy 1994-1999
- Putting HIV/AIDS counselling in South Africa in its place
- Lesotho 2000: public perceptions and perspectives
- Teleworking within government departments
- Public transport in the changing South Africa, 1994-2000
- Governance and institutional trust in South Africa: November 1999-September 2000