Domestic workers' rights in global development indicators
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2012
TITLE AUTHOR(S): T.Meyiwa
KEYWORDS: DOMESTIC WORKERS, HUMAN RIGHTS, LABOUR WORKING CONDITIONS
DEPARTMENT: Equitable Education and Economies (IED)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 7320
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/3361
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3361
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
The United Nations Millennium Summit in 2000, the largest-ever gathering of world leaders, representing 189 member states arrived at an internationally-agreed upon agenda. The agenda was a set of development indicators, which albeit with good intention, did not take into account the working conditions of vulnerable workers within either the formal or informal employment sectors. No specific goal on labour rights was included-a pressing concern, in particular for those who are treated unjustly in the workplace. At an international level, the vulnerability and exploitation of women in informal employment, has received increased attention in the last ten years and more recently within the sector of domestic work. One of the concerns has been that a number of domestic workers work under some of the most unprotected work conditions and suffer some of the worst forms of gender exploitation. Noting the omission of marginalised and vulnerable groups from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) there is a need for civil society to respond to their understanding of the MDGs so that poverty as it relates to the experience of marginalised working women is not overlooked in national plans to implement the MDGs. This Focus makes an argument for the rights of domestic workers to be integrated into the implementation programmes of MDGs. Domestic workers, comprising mostly women, face a range of workplace abuses as both family unpaid labour in some countries and as cheap labour, particularly in countries like South Africa where domestic employment practices have their roots in colonialism, and migrant labour under apartheid.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Local labour environments and further education and training (FET) colleges: three case studies: executive summary and transparancies
- Religion, globalisation, and human rights
- Local labour environments and further education and training (FET) colleges: three case studies
- Human rights
- Globalisation and the world of work
- Whose right it is anyway? equality, culture and conflicts of rights in South Africa
- From racial liberalism to corporate authoritarianism: the Shell affair and the assault on academic freedom in South Africa
- Socio-economic rights in the South African constitution: theory and practice
- Challenges of promoting and protecting the rights of cultural, religious and linguistic communities
- A human rights perspective on policy implementation processes: observations from the South African public service
- A human rights perspective on policy implementation processes: observations from the South African public service
- The global debate on multiculturalism and women's human rights in South Africa
- Women, culture and inequality: human rights and the feminisation of poverty in South Africa
- Concepts and standards of children's rights: some considerations of relativity and enforcement
- Concepts of childhood and the "right" treatment of children: culture, realtivity and human rights
- Whose right is it anyway?: equality and conflicts between state policy, culture and rights in South Africa
- The global debate on multiculturalism and women's human rights in South Africa
- Can there be any universal children's rights?: some considerations concerning relativity and enforcement
- Women's human rights and the "culture" of violence in South Africa
- Concept paper: awards to recognise those contributing to the celebration of the rights of cultural, religious and linguistic communities in South Africa