Looking good on paper: a qualitative study of ballot paper design and political party identification in South Africa
OUTPUT TYPE: Research report- client
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): G.Houston, J.Struwig, B.J.Roberts, S.L.Gordon, Y.D.Davids, S.Mtyingizane, N.Mchunu, T.Radebe, M.Ngungu, G.Maluleke, G.Fokou, V.Archary, N.Bohler-Muller
KEYWORDS: BALLOT PAPER, ELECTIONS, VOTING PROCEDURES
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10878
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/13971
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/13971
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2019
TITLE AUTHOR(S): G.Houston, J.Struwig, B.J.Roberts, S.L.Gordon, Y.D.Davids, S.Mtyingizane, N.Mchunu, T.Radebe, M.Ngungu, G.Maluleke, G.Fokou, V.Archary, N.Bohler-Muller
KEYWORDS: BALLOT PAPER, ELECTIONS, VOTING PROCEDURES
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10878
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/13971
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/13971
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
The Electoral Commission of South Africa commissioned the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) to review the ballot paper used in national and provincial elections as well as local government elections in South Africa. The ballot paper represents a critical material component of the electoral process, and its design is instrumental to the success of any election. The report is entitled the "Ballot Paper Design and Political Party Identification Study". The aim of the review was to assess the usability of ballot papers used in elections in the country. This was undertaken as a means of identifying potential areas of voter difficulty and generating insight into whether certain ballot design options might better enable voters to accurately register their choice in a clear and simple manner. The objective of the study was, therefore, to determine the general public views on the design features of the ballot paper that include: (i) the sequencing (ranking) of parties on the ballot; (ii) potential confusion arising from similar political party identifiers on the ballot paper; (iii) the sequencing of party identifiers in terms of the preferred order of presenting the party name, logo, acronym and photograph of political party leader; (iv) the numbering of parties on the ballot; and (v) the length of the ballot paper.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Politics and voting
- Popular attitudes towards the South African electoral system: report to the electoral task team.
- An unlikely success: South Africa and Lesotho's election of 2002
- Public participation in South Africa as we enter the 21st century
- Politics, voting and elections
- Voters' evaluation of the 2000 local government elections in South Africa
- The social dynamics in public participation in legislative processes in South Africa
- Lesotho: electoral landslide Heralds return to shaky democracy
- Democracy South Africa: evaluating the 1999 election
- Decoding South Africa's 1999 electoral geography
- Voting in action: focus group and workshop findings
- Popular attitudes toward the South African electoral system
- Adapting to electoral system change: voters in Lesotho, 2002
- Small parties to face oblivion
- Who will woo her on 14 April?: targeting the female electorate
- Electoral choice and party campaigns
- Elections 2004: the party lists and issues of identity
- Containing accountability
- The South African elections of 1994, 1999 and 2004: the (non) issues then and now
- Will South Africans 'give freedom a chance?'