The 'sacrifice' of human rights during an unprecedented pandemic: reflections on survey-based evidence
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 1975
TITLE AUTHOR(S): N.Bohler-Muller, B.Roberts, S.L.Gordon, Y.D.Davids
KEYWORDS: COVID-19, HUMAN RIGHTS, IMPACT STUDY
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 12786
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/18860
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/18860
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Twenty-five years into our constitutional democracy the Covid-19 pandemic led President Ramaphosa to declare a state of national disaster in terms of the Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002 (DMA). Strict lockdown regulations promulgated under the DMA had a clear bearing on human rights, such as the rights of religious observance, assembly and demonstration, association, movement, trade, and education. In the case of De Beer v Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (2020), the High Court declared some of the regulations promulgated under lockdown levels four and three irrational and thus unconstitutional. Yet the question we ask is, do ordinary South Africans support the limitation of their rights? To provide insight we analyse data from the University of Johannesburg and Human Sciences Research Council (UJ/HSRC) Covid-19 Democracy Survey, which was administered using a data free mobile platform from April 2020 to January 2021. Over three survey rounds, the willingness to sacrifice human rights remained high. Throughout the pandemic, the role of public opinion has been largely overlooked. The Covid-19 Democracy Survey served as one way to facilitate democratic participation as it allowed people to express their views, opinions and concerns about the virus and living under lockdown. This article discusses human rights 'sacrifice' in the specific context of this pandemic. It is argued that limiting certain constitutionally protected freedoms discussed herein may be necessary during a national disaster to 'flatten the curve' and protect oneself and others, but that careful attention should be paid to non-discrimination, dignity and the temporary nature of rights limitations.-
Related Research Outputs:
- The disabling and enabling effects of COVID-19: blog
- Viral life: Covid-19's destabilisation of our thinking
- Social and economic impact of Covid-19
- Pandemic responses must ensure human rights are protected
- COVID-19 and human rights limitations: taking public opinion into account
- Social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on youth in the Post School Education and Training (PSET) sector in South Africa
- Let your voice be heard: tell us about your experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic
- The case of South Africa: the societal impact of COVID-19
- South Africans with disabilities' experiences of Covid-19: an online survey
- Partnering with DPOs: socioeconomic wellbeing and human rights-related experiences of people with disabilities in Covid-19 times in South Africa: an online survey
- Socio-economic wellbeing and human rights-related experiences of people with disabilities in Covid-19 times in South Africa: final report
- Literature review to support a survey to understand the socio-economic, wellbeing and human rights related experiences of people with disabilities during Covid-19 Lockdown in South Africa
- Religion, globalisation, and human rights
- Human rights
- Globalisation and the world of work
- Whose right it is anyway? equality, culture and conflicts of rights in South Africa
- From racial liberalism to corporate authoritarianism: the Shell affair and the assault on academic freedom in South Africa
- Socio-economic rights in the South African constitution: theory and practice
- Challenges of promoting and protecting the rights of cultural, religious and linguistic communities
- A human rights perspective on policy implementation processes: observations from the South African public service