The absence of gender in South Africa's new industrial policy framework
SOURCE: Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): S.Ngandu
KEYWORDS: GENDER EQUALITY, INDUSTRIAL POLICY
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 5776
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/4923
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4923
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2008
TITLE AUTHOR(S): S.Ngandu
KEYWORDS: GENDER EQUALITY, INDUSTRIAL POLICY
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 5776
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/4923
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4923
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Though the new National Industrial Policy Framework (NIPF) is a step in the right direction towards diversifying the South African economy away from its mineral dependency, it is silent on gender issues. South Africa's industrial policy has never been gender sensitive. This has its roots in early industrialisation that was centred on the mining sector and the heavy resource processing industries that grow around it which were, and still are, male dominated. The policies that were implemented then entrenched an industrial structure that has remained static and gender-biased. Though there has been a growing awareness of the need to have gender-inclusive economic policies, it is argued that the failure of the new industrial policy framework to explicitly recognise gender relates to the way in which economists view men and women. Industrial policy like other economic policies tends to be influenced by economic theory, macroeconomics which focuses on non-gendered aggregates and microeconomics which assumes that men and women are homogenous in their preferences and endowments. This view tends to lead to economic policies that are genderblind. In the case of industrial policy, selecting sectors for intervention without a gender lens can further entrench the inequalities that exist between men and women at the industrial level. It is not sufficient for the industrial policy framework to assume that by targeting services sectors, such as business process outsourcing and hotel catering (tourism) which tend to have a relatively large number of women, there is no need to outline explicitly how the policy will help reduce gender inequalities and increase the participation of women in the industrialisation process. This focus argues that, in order to fundamentally change the status quo, gender issues in industrial development should not 'piggy back' on major polices but should be integrated from the outset.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Whose right it is anyway? equality, culture and conflicts of rights in South Africa
- Gender inequality persists in artisan employment in South Africa
- Social impact assessment of development projects
- Book review: Bradby, H. & Hundt, G.L. (eds). 2010. Global perspectives on war, gender and health: the sociology and anthropology of suffering. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing. 157 p. ISBN 9780754675235
- Gender equality and Curriculum 2005
- Overview of industrial policy
- Men, take a stand
- The great leap sideways: gender, culture and rights after 10 years of demcracy in South Africa
- Gender equity in South African education 1994-2004: conference proceedings
- Correcting gender inequalities is central to controlling HIV/AIDS
- Work value change in South Africa between 1995 and 2001: race, gender and occupations compared
- Education and health services (including HIV/AIDS and gender)
- A class act - mathematics as filter of equity in South Africa's schools
- Gender and HIV vaccine trials: ethics and social science issues
- Overview
- The role of the chapter 9 institutions in the promotion and protection of gender equality in South Africa
- Teacher education and the challenge of diversity in South Africa
- Masculine bodies, feminine symbols: challenging gendered identities or compulsory femininity?
- HIV/AIDS and 'othering' in South Africa: the blame goes on
- Lateral migration in resource-intensive economies: technological learning and industrial policy