Facilitating factors and barriers to malaria research utilization for policy development in Malawi
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2016
TITLE AUTHOR(S): C.A.Mwendera, C.De Jager, H.Longwe, K.Phiri, C.Hongoro, C.M.Mutero
KEYWORDS: MALARIA, MALAWI, POLICY FORMULATION
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 9428
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/10236
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/10236
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
Research on various determinants of health is key in providing evidence for policy development, thereby leading to successful interventions. Utilization of research is an intricate process requiring an understanding of contextual factors. The study was conducted to assess enhancing factors and barriers of research utilization for malaria policy development in Malawi. Qualitative research approach was used through in-depth interviews with 39 key informants that included malaria researchers, policy makers, programme managers, and key stakeholders. Purposive sampling and snowballing techniques were used in identifying key informants. Interview transcripts were entered in QSR Nvivo 11 software for coding and analysis. Respondents identified global efforts as key in advancing knowledge translation, while local political will has been conducive for research utilization. Other factors were availability of research, availability of diverse local researchers and stakeholders supporting knowledge translation. While barriers included: lack of platforms for researcher-public engagement, politics, researchers' lack of communication skills, lack of research collaborations, funder driven research, unknown World Health Organization policy position, and the lack of a malaria research repository. Overall, the study identified facilitating factors to malaria research utilization for policy development in Malawi. These factors need to be systematically coordinated to address the identified barriers and improve on malaria research utilization in policy development. Malaria research can be key in the implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce the malaria burden and assist in the paradigm shift from malaria control to elimination in Malawi.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Globalization and emerging trends in African states' foreign policy-making process
- Malaria research and its influence on anti-malarial drug policy in Malawi: a case study
- Changing the policy for intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during pregnancy in Malawi
- Malaria research in Malawi from 1984 to 2016: a literature review and bibliometric analysis
- Challenges to the implementation of malaria policies in Malawi
- Book review: Goetz, A.M., Hassim, S. (eds.) (2003). No shortcuts to power: African women in politics and policy making. Cape Town: Zed Books. 246 p. ISBN 1842771477
- The elusiveness of integration: policy discources on open and distance learning in the 1990s
- Changing modes: a brief overview of the mode 2 knowledge debate and its impact on South African policy formulation
- Interest group participation in the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC)
- Equity, development, and new knowledge production: an overview of the new higher education policy environment in post-apartheid South Africa
- Southern Africa: a review of the region
- Environmental education, ethics and action in southern Africa
- With Africa for Africa: towards quality education for all
- Evidence, policies and practices: continuities and discontinuities in mental health promotion in a developing country
- Book review: Soko, B. & Kubik, G. (2002) Nchimi Chikanga: the battle against witchcraft in Malawi. (Kachere Texts, 10). Blantyre, Christian Literature Association in Malawi. ISBN 999081645X
- Newspaper coverage of South African tobacco issues, 1997-2001
- The interface between research and policy dialogue: symbolic or substantive
- NASFAM funding proposal for the National AIDS Commission
- The interface between research and policy dialogue: substantive or symbolic?
- Improving the links between research, policy and implementation