Public perceptions of biotechnology in South Africa
SOURCE: South African Journal of Science
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2018
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Gastrow, B.Roberts, V.Reddy, S.Ismail
KEYWORDS: BIOTECHNOLOGY, PUBLIC OPINION, SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES), Equitable Education and Economies (IED)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10190
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/11686
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/11686
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2018
TITLE AUTHOR(S): M.Gastrow, B.Roberts, V.Reddy, S.Ismail
KEYWORDS: BIOTECHNOLOGY, PUBLIC OPINION, SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
DEPARTMENT: Developmental, Capable and Ethical State (DCES), Equitable Education and Economies (IED)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 10190
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/11686
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/11686
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
A nationally representative survey of the South African public's perceptions of biotechnology provides new insights into the position of the sector in the public sphere. Familiarity with the concept of biotechnology, and awareness of GM food, have increased over the last decade, although these changes have occurred from a low base. Compared to Europeans, South Africans are more positive about the health implications of GM food, less critical about the environmental impact of GM food, and more positive about the economic consequences of GM food. Knowledge about biotechnology is positively correlated with younger age, higher educational attainment and higher living standard. For marginalised groups, particularly low-income groups in rural areas and traditional authority areas, engaging on the basis of indigenous knowledge systems may prove to be the most effective platform for communication. The concepts of DNA and genes are far better understood than those of genetic modification or GM food, and would therefore present a better starting point for engagement and knowledge transfer. Together, these considerations point towards new strategic imperatives for public engagement in the South African biotechnology sector. Public policy, and broader sectoral engagement strategies, need to take into account: (1) the highly dynamic nature of public perceptions, (2) the diversity of views held by different demographic groups and (3) the diversity of sources of information utilised and preferred by different demographic groups. These considerations would support a strategically targeted engagement approach that would leverage the rapidly growing public awareness of biotechnology in a constructive manner.-
Related Research Outputs:
- The public understanding of biotechnology in the media
- Public perceptions of biotechnology in South Africa
- A survey of attitudes towards and use of cellular phones
- The drug-crime nexus in South Africa: the HSRC SA-ADAM national survey: the social construction of victimization and victim support. Part 4
- Decoding South Africa's 1999 electoral geography
- Public opinion on national priority issues
- Perceptions about democracy
- Politics and voting
- Institutional trust
- Crime
- Economic policies
- Community participation
- Introduction and methodology
- Service delivery perceptions during Mandela rule, 1994-1999
- Perceptions about economic issues
- National priorities
- Race = discontent?
- Personal consistency in responding to public opinion surveys: mining the 2001 HSRC survey responses to questions about democracy and Christianity
- The intricacies of large surveys
- Utopia on trial, again: residents' attitudes towards architectural aspects of Schubart Park and implications for "dignifying" its spaces