What's in the lunchbox?: dietary behaviour of learners from disadvantaged schools in the Western Cape, South Africa
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2011
TITLE AUTHOR(S): Z.Abrahams, A,De Villiers, N.P.Steyn, J.Fourie, L.Dalais, J.Hill, C.E.Draper, E.V.Lambert
KEYWORDS: DIETARY HABITS, FOOD AND NUTRITION, FOOD SECURITY, HEALTH, OBESITY, SCHOOL CHILDREN, WEIGHT MANAGEMENT, WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 6845
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/3773
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3773
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
To identify and describe factors associated with food shop (known as tuck shop in South Africa) and lunchbox behaviours of primary-school learners in South Africa. Analysis of data collected in 2008 from a cross-sectional survey. Sixteen primary schools in the Western Cape, South Africa. A total of 717 grade 4 learners aged 10-12 years. A 24 h recall established that 69% of learners carried a lunchbox to school and 49% had consumed at least one item purchased from the school food shop/ vendor. Most lunchboxes contained white bread with processed meat, whereas the most frequent food shop/vendor purchase comprised chips/crisps. Learners who carried a lunchbox to school had significantly lower BMI percentiles and BMI-for-age, compared with their counterparts. Moreover, they were younger, had higher standard-of-living and dietary diversity scores, consumed more meals per day, had greater self-efficacy and came from predominantly urban schools, compared with those who did not carry a lunchbox to school. Learners who ate food shop/vendor purchases had a lower standard-of-living score and higher dietary diversity and meal scores. Only 2% of learners were underweight, whereas 19% were stunted and 21% were overweight/obese. Children who carried a lunchbox to school appeared to have greater dietary diversity, consumed more regular meals, had a higher standard of living and greater nutritional self-efficacy compared with those who did not carry a lunchbox to school.-
Related Research Outputs:
- What's in the lunchbox?
- Overweight and obesity and associated factors among school-aged adolescents in Ghana and Uganda
- Stunting, overweight and obesity in the very young: two sides of the coin
- Dietary, social, and environmental determinants of obesity in Kenyan women
- The cost of a healthy diet: a South African perspective
- Overweight and obesity and associated factors among school-aged adolescents in Ghana and Uganda
- How diverse are our diets?
- Prevalence of obesity and associated factors in South Africans 50 years and older
- "Healthkick": formative assessment of the health environment in low-resource primary schools in the Western Cape province of South Africa
- Urbanisation and the nutrition transition: a comparison of diet and weight status of South African and Kenyan women
- You are what you eat and you eat what you can afford
- Overweight and obesity and associated factors among school-aged adolescents in Thailand
- Prevalence of overweight/obesity and central obesity and its associated factors among a sample of university students in India
- The association between nutrition and physical activity knowledge and weight status of primary school educators
- Underestimation of weight and its associated factors in overweight and obese university students from 21 low, middle and emerging economy countries
- The association of nutrition behaviors and physical activity with general and central obesity in Caribbean undergraduate students
- Overweight and obesity and associated factors among school-aged adolescents in six Pacific Island countries in Oceania
- Dietary behaviour among male out-patients in Thailand
- Obesity and lifestyle factors in male hospital out-patients in Thailand
- Overweight, obesity and associated factors among 13-15 years old students in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations member countries, 2007-2014