Life-history research: an emancipatory approach to institutional evaluations
OUTPUT TYPE: Conference or seminar papers
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2002
TITLE AUTHOR(S): R.Dhunpath
KEYWORDS: EVALUATION, INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION, INSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY, LIFE HISTORY RESEARCH, ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 2484
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/8127
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/8127
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2002
TITLE AUTHOR(S): R.Dhunpath
KEYWORDS: EVALUATION, INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION, INSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY, LIFE HISTORY RESEARCH, ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 2484
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/8127
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/8127
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
During the latter part of the 20th century, evaluation research has been characterised by an expansive proliferation of alternative paradigms, each claiming its space as a legitimate research genre. The authors own quest to create a space for an emancipatory approach to institutional evaluations has been simultaneously a rewarding and unsettling experience. This paper reflects on the incursion into the field of institutional biographies, focusing on how to come to terms with what Noel Cough (2002) describes as blind spots and blank spots. To this end, the author explores, in a mode of critical, self-reflexibility, some of the learning and insights, while putting up for scrutiny, some of the unresolved methodological dilemmas. The author explores, by referring to contemporary literature in the field, the epistemological underpinnings framing the narrative method, attempting to understand how it resonates with illuminative and empowerment evaluation. Alluding to vignettes derived from which to disrupt essentialist notions of qualitative research the author brings into the spotlight constructs such as validity and reliability, emotionality and neutrality and the influence of competing voices in research production. This paper problematise and complicate the assumptions that frame the genre with a view to highlighting the potential hazards of the narrative method becoming a "victory narrative within the redemptive culture of the social sciences".-
Related Research Outputs:
- Improving learning in South African schools: the Quality Learning Project mid-term evaluation
- Utilisation-focussed evaluation: a report back
- Revised final report on development of M&E system for the Community-based Rural Land Development Project in Malawi
- CMIP and LEDF: monitoring and evaluation
- An evaluation study of the implementation of common tasks for assessment in English and maths
- The 'health' of the non-profit sector: a case study analysis: draft report 2
- Open for business: observations on the R&D behavior of South African firms
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: Eastern Cape province
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: Free State province
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: Gauteng province
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: KwaZulu-Natal province
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: Limpopo province
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: Mpumalanga province
- Grade 6 Systemic Evaluation: North West Province
- Grade 6 systemic evaluation: Northern Cape province
- Grade 6 systemic evaluation: Western Cape province
- Grade 6 systemic evaluation: National
- Grade 6 systemic evaluation
- Methodological challenges in evaluating large scale intervention programs: Reflections from the quality learning project
- North West province grade 6 systemic evaluation launch