Bantustan education history: the 'progressivism' of Bophutatswana's Primary Education Upgrade Programme (PEUP), 1979-1988
SOURCE: South African Historical Journal
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2013
TITLE AUTHOR(S): L.Chisholm
KEYWORDS: BOPHUTATSWANA, EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL REFORM, PRIMARY EDUCATION, RACIAL SEGREGATION
DEPARTMENT: Equitable Education and Economies (IED)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 7684
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/3001
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3001
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2013
TITLE AUTHOR(S): L.Chisholm
KEYWORDS: BOPHUTATSWANA, EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL REFORM, PRIMARY EDUCATION, RACIAL SEGREGATION
DEPARTMENT: Equitable Education and Economies (IED)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 7684
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/3001
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/3001
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.
Abstract
The historiography of South Africa's apartheid-era Bantustans has commonly focused on their repressive role. New approaches to this history have suggested that some undertook educational initiatives that broke with the dominant apartheid model. Bophutatswana's Primary Education Upgrading Programme (PEUP) was such an initiative. This article focuses on the actors, origins, aims and practices of the programme and assessments by contemporaries and its strengths and weaknesses. Using documentary evidence on the project, interviews with its initiators and participants in the programme, as well as assessments by contemporaries at the time, it argues that the project involved a contradictory alliance of conservative Bantustan leaders and Christian liberals. The project drew on progressivist, child-centred ideas borrowed from Europe and the United Kingdom but these were encased within the broader ethnic apartheid project and served a legitimatory purpose. PEUP included both innovative aspects within the context of Bantu Education but also continuities with its broader ethnic purposes. Miserly budgets, Bantustan politics, and limitations specific to progressivism ultimately undermined the success of the PEUP. Nonetheless, the project survived in memories of teachers.-
Related Research Outputs:
- Apartheid education legacies and new directions in post-apartheid South Africa
- Book review: Harber, C. (2000) State of transition: post-apartheid educational reform in South Africa (Monographs in international education) Walligford, Oxford: Symposium Books. ISBN 1 873927 19 3
- Non governmental organisations and education in South Africa
- Deracialisation & migration of learners in South African schools
- Opening the doors of learning: where is the principal?: a position paper
- Globalization and the social construction of reality: affirming or unmasking the "inevitable"?
- Problems and possibilities in multilingual classrooms in the Western Cape
- The role of local authorities in supporting the facilitation of formal education services
- With Africa for Africa: towards quality education for all
- Rural schools and education in South Africa, draft report
- South African education policy review: 1993-2000
- Contextualising ICT benefits in an educational environment: the case of the DOC-WILS initiative
- Book review: Kallaway, P. (ed.) (2002) The history of education under apartheid. New York: Peter Lang
- Redressing educational inequalities: a classroom perspective
- Bringing the SA rainbow into schools
- Information and support for improving the education system
- Information for improving schools and systems
- Assessment systems and practices in developing nations: implications for education policy
- Study on medium of instruction in primary schools in Ethiopia: final report
- Assessment and education quality in South Africa